On 2009-07-15 17:57:36 Phil Coates wrote:
I encounter a problem right at the beginning. You quote Hagberg suggesting that artistic meaning might be beyond the sayable. Then you ask what it might be for something material to lie beyond the sayable. Meaning, though, surely isn`t material. I`m sure the apparent conflation of the meaning and the materiality of a work of art is a trivial matter in the context in which you use it. I does seem to highlight a general problem though. When we talk about art or Art or use a dozen similar terms we are in a semiotic sea before we start. You seem to be able to dive in and enjoy the discourse about the ambiguities within. I`m hesitating on the sidelines wondering whether I could ever know where were I was without the dry land of Popper`s epistemology and the probabilities of physics. Of course I could and perhaps do dive in and simply swim without knowing where I am but then I could never say anything very intelligent about the experience. I`ve a feeling however, that your discourse is about a different quality of unsayables. Perhaps we need a whole new set of words with rather more narrow associations.
On 2009-07-15 17:59:15 Ian Hays wrote:
I take it that "meaning" is provoked through the material object such as a painting, say, or a book or an essay - words being material. A baby crying (and so on ad infinitum) has "meaning" for us, but, I don`t think that Hagberg`s blindness to his own way of writing is a "trivial" matter but quite the reverse: That is what I am talking about here - Hagberg (for instance, and its a good instance since his book on Wittgenstein is a published tome of some importance) "underplays the fact that his research is happening in language while asking questions such as the following, for instance" (..."beyond the sayable") when in fact by bringing up "the unsayable" he is indicating a metaphysical realm about which humans can know nothing save "the unsayable" - there is a great deal to think about in this proposition that even Wittgenstein (hence the choice of Hagberg on Wittgenstein) would later call a "language game" - in this case a "metaphysical language game". Hagberg has not been, as it were, "creative" with Wittgenstein`s work seen as whole. There is no certain conclusion to such a problem concerning aesthetics even though the early Wittgenstein who wrote the Tractatus thought there must be a conclusion and that such a conclusion would be brought about through the logical processes of thought, but that this could not be achieved in the practices of aesthetics and art. He thought we had to "stay silent" on such matters. In the Investigations he reversed his position entirely but with great subtlety and there is an interesting passage from Sam Slote`s essay on Ulysses for the Cornell University Joyce Conference (2005) from which I quote below regarding this:

The particular grammatical quirks trademark to Eumaean style [chapter in Ulysses] can be characterised as a language game. A basic definition of a language game from Wittgenstein`s Philosophical Investigations is that it is a delimited set of learned or created protocols not always susceptible to codification. The protocols for "Eumaeus" involve distortion of grammatical norms, often for humorous effect, and "with apologies to Lindley Murray" (U 16.1475). For Wittgenstein, language games are eminently labile and fungible and cannot be reduced to a calculus, or a single over-arching grammar, such as he had essayed in the Tractatus (an argument can be made that Wittgenstein caricatured the Tractatus in the Investigations, but that`s another story).

Clearly enough, features of thought that occur around objects of "art", say, are features that can be learnt, and around which words cluster as to a magnet as in other kinds of language games such as ten-pin bowling, cricket, saying hello and Hi, and Gardening (again ad infinitum). I am trying to counter desires people have in terms of Literature and Art to eschew the material in which they are working, and I think for a very good reason. If we are thinking more broadly and if we are able to engage more interestedly with the world of the work of art - get to know and understand something of it`s "language game possibilities", the world itself must become a richer place to live in. Jackson Pollock for instance, from this viewpoint, could be described as a chap who was caught, as it were, in the "language games and contexts of his day" via various art historians, but without this backup language we could say he was merely dancing around on canvases, probably half-pissed, dripping paint about in his shed.

The "game" of finding out what happens when we think we are doing art is an endless phenomenon for many reasons that can be treated within rich or dull "Language Games. This is why Joyce and Duchamp take issue with Art that does not understand the context in which it is being created: thus Duchamp`s double ironies and Joyce`s uses of Pastiche in the Eumaeus chapter of Ulysses - "quirky" because Joyce is ironising several authors and their styles / uses of grammar simultaneously - in many layers. Hence Duchamp`s use of the printed picture to which he added a touch or two of paint called Pharmacie.
On 2009-11-24 17:36:50 vubjebuideobe wrote:
danke
On 2010-05-11 04:25:00 fleeliece wrote:
Hey im new to this. I came accross this site I find It positively accommodating & it has helped me out loads. I should be able to contribute and assist other people like it has helped me.

Cheers, Catch You Later
On 2010-05-31 01:21:02 Ulcerrero wrote:
Howdy im fresh here, I hit upon this website I find It vastly useful & it`s helped me out a lot. I should be able to give something back and guide other people like it has helped me.

Thanks, See Ya Later
On 2010-06-05 06:39:55 Ulcerrero wrote:
Good Day i`m fresh here, I stumbled upon this board I have found It incredibly accessible & its helped me out a great deal. I hope to contribute & guide other people like it has helped me.

Cheers, See Ya About.
On 2010-06-06 21:25:56 fleeliece wrote:
Heya i am new on here, I stumbled upon this site I find It exceedingly useful & its helped me so much. I hope to give something back and guide other users like its helped me.

Cheers, See You Later
On 2010-06-12 21:37:13 Ulcerrero wrote:
Hello i`m new here, I came upon this website I have found It amply useful & it has helped me out alot. I hope to give something back & guide other people like its helped me.

Thanks Everyone, Catch You Around.
On 2010-06-13 00:24:41 fleeliece wrote:
Hi i`m fresh on here, I stumbled upon this site I find It quite accessible & its helped me alot. I should be able to give something back & help others like its helped me.

Thanks, See You Around
On 2010-06-13 03:44:57 Ulcerrero wrote:
Hey i am new here, I hit upon this board I find It exceedingly helpful and its helped me out alot. I hope to give something back & aid other users like it has helped me.

Thanks Everyone, Catch You Around.
On 2010-06-13 09:55:04 Ulcerrero wrote:
Hi-ya i am fresh to this. I stumbled upon this forum I find It truly accommodating & it`s helped me out loads. I should be able to give something back & help other users like its helped me.

Thank You, See Ya About.
On 2010-06-13 16:11:18 Ulcerrero wrote:
Howdy i am fresh to this. I hit upon this message board I find It exceedingly accessible & it has helped me out tons. I hope to contribute & assist other users like its helped me.

Thanks a load, Catch You Later.
On 2010-06-13 21:46:09 Ulcerrero wrote:
Greetings i`m fresh on here, I stumbled upon this message board I have found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me alot. I should be able to give something back and guide other users like its helped me.

Thanks, See Ya Later.
On 2010-06-14 02:54:21 Ulcerrero wrote:
Greetings i am fresh here, I stumbled upon this message board I find It positively accommodating & it`s helped me a great deal. I should be able to give something back & assist other users like its helped me.

Thanks Everyone, See You Later.
On 2010-06-15 03:02:20 Ulcerrero wrote:
Howdy im new on here. I came accross this board I find It quite helpful & it`s helped me loads. I hope to contribute and support other users like it has helped me.

Thanks Everyone, See You Around.
On 2010-06-15 21:55:10 Ulcerrero wrote:
Hi im fresh to this, I stumbled upon this forum I find It positively accessible and it has helped me out alot. I hope to contribute and aid others like its helped me.

Thanks a load, See Ya Later.
On 2010-06-17 08:11:06 Ulcerrero wrote:
Howdy i`m fresh here. I stumbled upon this message board I find It truly accessible & it has helped me tons. I hope to contribute and aid other users like its helped me.

Cheers, See You Around
On 2010-07-11 04:33:47 Zefequifs wrote:
Hello I`m new. Nice forum. Just found it on Google. Thanks for the Brilliant community we have here :)
Thread Title:
Your name:
Comment:

Using the Forums
Lgxfaedx (1)NewtoForex (1)Reading the essay from Buffalo 2009 (18)Language and the Visual (6)Work in Progress (17)Is this feature working ? (5)